[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Top Containers for volumes

Paul Sutherland psutherland at amphilsoc.org
Wed Feb 13 11:25:55 EST 2019

Hi Adrien,

How about: Volume 1.1-1.5; 2.1-2.5?


On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:53 AM Hilton, Adrien <adrien_hilton at harvard.edu>

> Hi,
> I’m in the process of retrospectively adding top containers to all of our
> 800,000+ archival objects. A large number of our collections are in volume
> format, housed on shelves as is, not in boxes. I’m wondering how folks are
> handling these types of “containers” in AS.
> Just for an example, the Jared Sparks papers consists of 10 individual
> volumes, which if these were boxes, of course would be Boxes 1-10. However,
> the material is a two part series, each consisting of 5 volumes each and
> referred to on spines as volumes 1-5 (1st series) and another volumes 1-5
> (2nd series). I’m disinclined to give them top containers Volumes 1-10
> and I don’t want to have two Volume 1 Top Containers in the same
> collection. Any advise on how to make this clear to users and manageable on
> the back end?
> Thanks in advance,
> Adrien
> _______________________________________________
> Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
> Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org
> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

*Paul Sutherland* (he/his)
Archivist of Native American Materials
Center for Native American and Indigenous Research
American Philosophical Society
105 S. 5th Street, 2nd Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19406

Browse our new Indigenous Subject Guide
and read our latest blog posts
Twitter: @paulssutherland <https://twitter.com/paulssutherland>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20190213/e244e91c/attachment.html>

More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list