[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Component Unique Identifiers questions

[Larry Weimer]

Maggie,

To answer your first question, we (New-York Historical) do not currently
use the CUI field at all. We include "Series X" or "Subseries X.1" in the
component title. The other ASpace example for this field, accession number,
we would include in an Immediate Source of Acquisition note (though we more
commonly just refer to the source by their name and date, rather than the
number. We use the "Related Resource" field to link the accession number to
the collection.)

Larry

Larry Weimer
Head of Archival Processing
New-York Historical Society

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Hughes, Margaret <mhughes at library.ucla.edu>
wrote:

> Confusion over the CUI field came up recently for us, as well, and we're
> wondering how we should move forward using it.
>
> Regarding the first question: I'm wondering if other institutions are
> using the CUI to record information like "Series I" or "Subseries 8.4"? And
> if so, are you happy with how the CUI exports in the EAD? As far as I
> understand, the CUI field exports in EAD as <unitid> which comes after the
> title <unittitle>. Maybe this is specific to our practice, and it's
> something that could also be fixed with a stylesheet, but it seems like it
> would make more sense for the <unitid> to precede the <unittitle>, if it is
> indeed intended for information like "Series I" or "Subseries 8.4". Then
> the result in the EAD would likely display as "Series 1 Correspondence". If
> institutions are not using the CUI to record "Series 1", are you including
> that in the title field? Or not noting series and subseries numbers at all?
>
> Relating to the second question, as you said the top container field pulls
> and displays both the Level of Description (if it is "series") and the
> information in the CUI, so it results in top containers like “Series Series
> X". Is this the intended behavior? My inclination is that displaying this
> information in the top container does not make sense and is not helpful,
> especially in cases where containers belong to multiple series. I tested it
> with adding a box to four different series and it lists all four in the top
> container (see attached screenshot). Are others experiencing this and
> accepting it/ignoring it?
>
> Any help is much appreciated!
>
> Maggie
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org [mailto:
> archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of
> Tang, Lydia
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 10:07 AM
> To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group@
> lyralists.lyrasis.org>
> Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Component Unique Identifiers questions
>
> Hi all,
> I’m passing along a question for a friend and then have a set of slightly
> related questions of my own:
>
>   1.  I am trying to find a way to have a series identifier code appear on
> the finding aid.  The Component Unique Identifier does not appear to print,
> and the only examples I have come across have just added Series 1 to the
> beginning of the series name as in:
> Series 1. Athletic Council records, 1903-1975.  Does anyone use the Series
> code on your finding aid, and if so, where do you add it?
>   2.  My question: I have a legacy imported collection which uses the
> Series info in the CUI.  It displays as “Series Series X” in the top
> container field.  Sorry if I’m stating the obvious, but this label pulls
> the first “series” from the level of description – only if it is at a
> series level (I tried changing it to subseries and other smaller levels)
> and the rest is free text from the CUI.  When there are materials from more
> than one series are shared in a Top Container, it lists off possibly up to
> two series (it didn’t seem like it listed off 3 or more, but I might have
> been confusing myself).  I am not sure that Staff Interface recommendations
> by SIEWG touched on the CUI, so I wanted to ask:
>      *   Would it be helpful to have a publish function for the CUI?  Just
> trying to imagine it, it would be an established default setting with a
> check box to manually change.
>      *   Is displaying the information in the Top Container the most
> efficient/logical place - especially in cases of extensive intellectual
> arrangement of items belonging to multiple series sharing a container?
> There is a JIRA relating to CUI display: https://archivesspace.
> atlassian.net/browse/ANW-279  Does this resonate with the broader
> membership (you all)?
>      *   Is deriving a portion of the label from the level of description
> for the CUI universally helpful?  How about in cases of electronic file
> names or labeling physical objects with the corresponding scanned object
> identifier?  Alternatively, would enabling this action for smaller levels
> of description (sub-series, file, item, etc), be helpful?
> I’m just trying to wrap my head around it, so any feedback/clarifications
> are greatly appreciated!
> Lydia
> --
> Dr. Lydia Tang, CA, DAS, DMA, MLIS
> Special Collections Archivist-Librarian
> Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Ethics Bibliographer Michigan State University
> Libraries
> 366 W. Circle Drive (DB 6)
> East Lansing, MI 48824-1048
> Email: ltang5 at msu.edu
> Phone: 517-884-8984
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
> Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org
> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
>
>

-- 
 <http://www.nyhistory.org/exhibitions/walk-way-footwear-stuart-weitzman>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20180920/ca8c32c1/attachment.html>