[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances without containers

Ben Goldman bmg17 at psu.edu
Fri Jul 14 14:58:10 EDT 2017

Thanks to everyone for sharing some of their approaches to encoding top containers. It's been very helpful for us in working through local scenarios. 

Best Regards, 

Ben Goldman 
Digital Records Archivist & 
Sally W. Kalin Early Career Librarian for Technological Innovations 
Penn State University Libraries 

From: "Peterson, Christie" <cspeterson at email.gwu.edu> 
To: "Archivesspace Users Group" <archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org> 
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:06:35 AM 
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Encoding instances without containers 

Here at GW, we are actively in the process of migrating from 1.4.3 to 1.5 (i.e., to top containers) and our goal is for non-boxed volumes and artifacts to be their own top containers, as Adrien and Kate have suggested. I'm curious if there was some reason why you didn't want to go that route? Something that maybe we haven't considered? 

Christie S. Peterson 
University Archivist 
George Washington University Libraries 
704H Gelman Library 
[ mailto:cspeterson at gwu.edu | cspeterson at gwu.edu ] 

Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list 
Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20170714/b272fdcc/attachment.html>

More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list