[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Using the Rights sub-records instead of Conditions Governing Access/Use notes?

[Caldera, Mary]

Hi, Jordan,

The Yale ArchivesSpace Committee considered using the rights records before we proceeded with developing the machine actionable conditions governing access and use note. Here is a link to the topic discussion in the AS Google Group list (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/archivesspace/EGdXp7_l-XQ). A search on the list might bring up some of the pros and cons. - Best, Mary

From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org [mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of Jordon Steele
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:19 AM
To: 'Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org' <Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Using the Rights sub-records instead of Conditions Governing Access/Use notes?

Hi all,

I know most of the conversation around the Rights sub-records has been limited to digital records, but our analysis suggests that conceptually rights sub-records are simply more granular, machine-actionable forms of conditions governing access and use notes that apply to both analog and digital collections. So we're considering doing away completely with our use of the more general conditions governing access and use notes in favor of these more precise rights sub-records. Has anyone else considered or done this, or considered it and chose not to? Are we missing something?

Thanks!

Best,

Jordon

Jordon Steele
Hodson Curator of the University Archives
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
3400 N Charles St
Baltimore, MD 21218
410-516-5493
jsteele at jhu.edu<mailto:jsteele at jhu.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20160929/7384d717/attachment.html>