[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Problem with Collection Management - Processing Status and Catalogued Note
Chris.Fitzpatrick at lyrasis.org
Fri Jul 17 14:17:44 EDT 2015
Sorry, it looks like the ticket associated to these changes didn't get put into the release notes because it was classified in Jira as a "CHORE" for some reason. I've updated the notes on the github release page.
The ticket is here:
and I think most of the explanation is in the word document that is attached to it.
Was there an issue with the migration?
Chris Fitzpatrick | Developer, ArchivesSpace
Skype: chrisfitzpat | Phone: 918.236.6048
From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org <archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org> on behalf of Emma Jolley <EJOLLEY at nla.gov.au>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:18 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group (archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org)
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Problem with Collection Management - Processing Status and Catalogued Note
We are currently testing the latest release in our test system (v1.3.0) and are getting some very frustrating results.
One of them is that the Processing_Status which was within the Collection_Management sub record appears to have been moved to an Event and in the process the drop down list (within processing status) appears to have been de-coupled from the accession records we had marked as having particular processing status'.
In addition the Catalogued_Note also within the Collection_Mangement sub-record has also been moved to an Event.
Was this a planned change? And if so is there a written explanation of these changes that I can check.
Any help and explanation would be gratefully received.
Emma Jolley| Curator of Digital Archives, Pictures and Manuscripts Branch|National Library of Australia Canberra ACT 2600
e: emma.jolley at nla.gov.au<mailto:emma.jolley at nla.gov.au>|t: 02 6262 1456| www.nla.gov.au/ms<http://www.nla.gov.au/ms>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group