[Lyrarl] Putting price of e-books via different aggregators into appropriate comparative context

Tue Sep 23 09:56:30 EDT 2014

"In conclusion, price may constitute a factor in library acquisitions but can only be assessed within the context of what publishers charge for their books."

And the publisher's licensing terms.

Deborah

From: lyrarl-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org [mailto:lyrarl-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of Swindler, Luke
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:33 AM
To: LYRASIS ARL Collection Development Contacts
Subject: [Lyrarl] Putting price of e-books via different aggregators into appropriate comparative context

Celeste,

When taking into account price per title as a possible factor influencing library acquisition, Lyrasis needs to keep in mind that cost is not related to platform per se; rather, price fundamentally reflects what the publishers included by an aggregator offering charge for their print and e-books.

This determinant becomes evident when one looks at mean book prices according to YBP Library Services data.  OUP monographs are significantly more expensive than the average price of the university press book:  Whereas the YBP mean price for university press monographs in FY2013/2014 was $73.02, OUP came in at $91.73.  Harvard University Press, by way of contrast, registered an exceptionally low mean price of $40.35.  As a result, UPSO titles-which are dominated by OUP imprints are significantly more expensive than De Gruyter distributed e-books that include only HUP, while MUSE titles are in between in terms of cost.

Within this broader context, comparisons of which aggregator offers the best pricing needs to be based on analyzing the same publishers in the mix.  Having reviewed numerous records in YBP's GOBI database for university press e-books that are offered by different aggregators, for example, MUSE versions of e-books seem to me to be more expense than the same titles offered by Books at JSTOR platform.

In conclusion, price may constitute a factor in library acquisitions but can only be assessed within the context of what publishers charge for their books.

Luke Swindler

*******************************************************************************
Luke Swindler                               Collections Management Officer
Davis Library    CB #3918                        luke_swindler at unc.edu<mailto:luke_swindler at unc.edu>
University of North Carolina                           TEL (919-962-1095)
Chapel Hill, NC  27514   USA                        FAX (919-962-4450)
*************************************************"*****************************
"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most
intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change." Charles Darwin

On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:33 AM, Celeste Feather <celeste.feather at lyrasis.org<mailto:celeste.feather at lyrasis.org>> wrote:

I'd like to check in with you quickly as I begin working with the university press ebook aggregators for 2015 collection offers through the ARL Licensing Initiative in the next few weeks. As I look over all the activity of the past few years, one thing I've noticed is that participation in the OUP University Press Scholarship Online (UPSO) offers is lower than participation in the MUSE and De Gruyter/Harvard University Press offers. I'd like to get a little more information from this community about why this might be happening.

One reason that quickly comes to mind is the per title pricing in the UPSO collections, which is higher than the per title pricing from MUSE and De Gruyter/HUP. I continue to press this point with OUP. I also know that there are several existing consortial group offers for OUP/UPSO ebooks that pre-date the ARL Licensing Initiative, and these may be contributing to the lower participation level.   I am wondering, though, if there are other factors that I could share with OUP as we negotiate for 2015.

If those of you from libraries that have not participated in an ARL UPSO offer yet could take 3 minutes to give me some feedback, I would be most appreciative.

Here's a link to a quick survey so I can gather your responses efficiently:   https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ARLUPSO

Please respond by Friday, September 26 if you are able. I will always take input at any time, of course!

The survey asks the following questions:

1.       Did your library consider participating in the ARL offers for Oxford University Press Scholarship Online during 2013 and 2014? Yes/No

2.       [If No] What factors contributed to the decision?
a.       Already participating in another group offer for UPSO content
b.      Prefer to purchase titles selectively rather than in collections
c.       Lack of available funds
d.      Content not of high interest to user community
e.      Other, please comment:

3.       [If Yes]What factors contributed to the decision not to participate after your library considered a purchase of UPSO content?
a.       Cost too high
b.      Lack of available funds
c.       Did not like platform
d.      Preferred to purchase titles selectively rather than in collections
e.      Other, please comment:

4.       How likely is it that your library will consider participating in the upcoming UPSO 2015 offer?
a.       Very likely
b.      Somewhat likely
c.       Don't know
d.      Not likely

Thanks for your help.

Celeste

Celeste Feather
Senior Licensing Program Account Manager
LYRASIS
celeste.feather at lyrasis.org<mailto:celeste.feather at lyrasis.org>
800-999-8558 ext. 2954 (Toll-free)
678-235-2954 (Direct)
celeste.feather (Skype)

<image001.png><http://www.lyrasis.org/>

<image002.jpg><http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lyrasis/148102075244><image003.jpg><https://twitter.com/lyrasis>

_______________________________________________
Lyrarl mailing list
Lyrarl at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:Lyrarl at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/lyrarl

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/lyrarl/attachments/20140923/e81a9914/attachment.html>