[Archivesspace_Users_Group] linking to related Resources / Archival Objects in ArchivesSpace
cory_nimer at byu.edu
Wed May 25 11:15:00 EDT 2022
I would agree that it would be preferable to have a more EAD3-friendly configuration for related materials notes, at least in order to reduce/remove the need for mixed content within these notes. I don't know if there is widespread interest in moving implementing something more like the Agents module's Sources subrecord or the Metadata Rights Declarations with their fields for recording a descriptive note and a URL separately. It looks like the project has already rejected the idea of being allowing linking between different records within the database, though (ANW-763; https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-763).
Brigham Young University
From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org <archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org> On Behalf Of Ron Van den Branden
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 10:05 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] linking to related Resources / Archival Objects in ArchivesSpace
Many thanks for your helpful reply! In our current data, these structured links are indeed connected to a field that maps to <relatedmaterial> in ArchivesSpace, so that’s indeed the destination we had in mind.
Your example for embedding ArchivesSpace-internal links via the ArchivesSpace ID for a @href attribute was really helpful and finally made me get it working in the test instance, great! That’s a useful mechanism, though I fully agree the manual input process is brittle, even with the (limited) “mixed content” completion help. In order to make the most semantic sense, as you exemplified with the <archref> example, our colleagues and volunteers describing the archives would have to be knowledgeable of XML syntax rules, and the suitable EAD structures for the information they’d want to enter. Yet, even if a new structured resource-to-resource link field would be too far off the implementation horizon, perhaps a general improvement for adding such internal cross-links in text fields in a more guided way could be of interest. I’ll think about it!
Finally, your data audit remark sounds intriguing and -considering the amount of data cleanup this data migration project has confronted us with- a vital part of best practice. Would you mind elaborating on that, or pointing me to any available documentation?
Van: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org> <archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org>> Namens Corey Schmidt
Verzonden: woensdag 25 mei 2022 14:57
Aan: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Onderwerp: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] linking to related Resources / Archival Objects in ArchivesSpace
Glad to see you reaching out! I’m not sure if others have emailed you regarding this, so I’ll put in my 2 cents worth.
* From what I understand, there is no mechanism within ArchivesSpace that provides a structured “Agents/Related Accessions” type link from one resource to another, nor one archival object to another.
* Have you considered using the “Related Materials” note (<relatedmaterial><https://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/elements/relatedmaterial.html>)? The advantage with this is the note is made specifically for related materials either within the repository or without and you don’t need a full URL, just the ArchivesSpace ID if you’re using the PUI, like so: <archref><unittitle href="/repositories/2/resources/100">Related Collection title</unittitle>. The problem with this is you have to enter the info by hand, which is error prone (we’ve scheduled a yearly “data audit” to help us catch errors like these).
* I don’t know of any institution that has developed a plugin<https://github.com/archivesspace/awesome-archivesspace>, nor is this on the roadmap I think. Nevertheless, you can submit a JIRA ticket<https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/ANW/issues/ANW-1334> for this feature (how to do that linked here<https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ADC/pages/19202060/How+to+Request+a+New+Feature>) – explaining how you want it to work with as much detail as possible. The Development Priority Team will then determine if the ArchivesSpace development team or community can/should prioritize it in future releases. The more attention a ticket gets (comments, clarifications, etc.) the more likely it is to be implemented (great YouTube video here about the process<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlquifRXwmA>).
I hope this is helpful, but if you’d like to talk more about it, feel free to email me: Corey.Schmidt at uga.edu<mailto:Corey.Schmidt at uga.edu>. To everyone on the listserv, please feel free to correct any of this info if it’s incorrect/misleading.
Special Collections Libraries | Project Management Librarian/Archivist
300 S Hull St | Athens, GA 30605
Corey.Schmidt at uga.edu<mailto:Corey.Schmidt at uga.edu>
From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org> <archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org>> On Behalf Of Ron Van den Branden
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 3:45 PM
To: archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] linking to related Resources / Archival Objects in ArchivesSpace
[EXTERNAL SENDER - PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY]
This is my first message to this group; apologies if this has been addressed before (tried my best researching the list archive at https://firstname.lastname@example.org/). At my institution, we’re preparing a migration of data from a previous archival description system to ArchivesSpace. The previous system allowed for structured links between archival descriptions within the system. For example, resource A could point to resource B within the same system by means of a system identifier, which the system would resolve to a full link in the PUI. This is functioning in a similar way as Agents Links or Related Accessions sections in ArchivesSpace; only with a different record type (resources / archival objects instead of agents, resp. accessions).
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t see an immediate equivalent mechanism in ArchivesSpace. This raises some questions:
* Am I overlooking the obvious, and does ArchivesSpace provide a structured mechanism to point from a Resource / Archival Object to another Resource / Archival Object?
* If not, I do see the External Documents section as a close fit, with the semantic drawback that these linked resources are not really external but rather internal. More substantially, though, External Documents only allows for a literal URL, which is less elegant, more error-prone, and less sustainable than the dynamically generated links provided via Agent Links or Related Accessions.
* If not, is this something that’s on a development roadmap, or have others implemented this as a plug-in?
Many thanks for your thoughts!
Ron Van den Branden | functioneel analist - applicatiebeheerder Letterenhuis
Stad Antwerpen | Talentontwikkeling en Vrijetijdsbeleving | Musea en Erfgoed
Minderbroedersstraat 22, 2000 Antwerpen
✉ Grote Markt 1, 2000 Antwerpen
gsm +32 0485 02 80 50 | tel. +32 3 222 93 30
letterenhuis.be<http://www.letterenhuis.be/> | instagram<https://www.instagram.com/letterenhuis/> | facebook<https://www.facebook.com/Letterenhuis>
Vergissen is menselijk. Dus als deze e-mail, samen met eventuele bijlagen, niet voor u bestemd is, vragen we u vriendelijk om dat te melden aan de afzender. Deze e-mail en de bijlagen zijn namelijk officiële documenten van de stad Antwerpen. Ze kunnen vertrouwelijke of persoonlijke informatie bevatten. Als stad nemen we privacy heel serieus en willen we als een goede huisvader waken over de vertrouwelijkheid van documenten. Als u dit bericht per vergissing hebt ontvangen of ergens hebt gevonden, wees dan zo eerlijk om het meteen te verwijderen en het niet verder te verspreiden of te kopiëren.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group