[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Error? - Stanford upgrade from 1.5.4 to 2.6.0

Michael G Olson mgolson at stanford.edu
Wed Oct 16 15:24:53 EDT 2019


Hi Steve, all,

Sorry about that… the error message we’re receiving when we click on the Collection tree is, "Oops! We're having trouble fetching this tree. Please try refreshing the page.”

If you open the image titled extent you'll see how our archivist entered the extent for this particular collection.  It looks like this isn't really defined as a true child of the collection.

thanks,

Michael


________________________________
From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org <archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org> on behalf of Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g) <sdm7g at virginia.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 12:15 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Error? - Stanford upgrade from 1.5.4 to 2.6.0


Error messages/images are too compressed or small to read. Just a blur.  Can you resend or else transcribe ?  — Steve M.


On Oct 16, 2019, at 2:52 PM, Michael G Olson <mgolson at stanford.edu<mailto:mgolson at stanford.edu>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Here at Stanford Libraries we just ran an upgrade from 1.5.4 to version 2.6.0 and noticed some odd behavior we’d like to validate with our peers.  We received no error messages while running the upgrade.  That said, for one of our repositories (we have many) we’ve noticed that by clicking on the resource tree we get an error message.  I’m speculating here but my guess is that the extent for this resources were not defined in such a way the application knows the relationship between parent and child.  Here is the error message we’re seeing.

.<cub_001.jpeg>

For this particular example here is how our extents had been entered in application.

<cub_002.jpeg>

My questions are has anyone seen this sort of behavior before?  Is this something we can fix in the upgraded application or do we need to implement a fix before the upgrade.  Any insights anyone has on this issue would be much appreciated!

Michael


_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20191016/0ef4930e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cub_001.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 51798 bytes
Desc: cub_001.jpeg
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20191016/0ef4930e/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: extent.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 67517 bytes
Desc: extent.jpeg
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20191016/0ef4930e/attachment-0001.jpeg>


More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list