[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Archon creator records and repositories
Brian Hoffman
brianjhoffman at gmail.com
Sun Aug 30 08:41:14 EDT 2015
Hi Matt,
Creators aren’t tied to a repository in ArchivesSpace. Unlike Resources or Accessions they are ‘global’ in scope. I believe all Archon creator records should migrate into ArchivesSpace.
Brian
> On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Matthew J Gorzalski <mGorzalski at lib.siu.edu> wrote:
>
> Thanks Brian. I think you understood my question. I was wondering what would happen to Archon creator records during the migration if they had no designated repository, and how ArchivesSpace would handle those records as far as public searching and display is concerned. Archon allows you to specify a repository for a creator record, but repositories in Archon seems to put less emphasis on repositories than ASpace does. In other words, the selected repository for an Archon creator record makes little to no difference.
>
> matt
>
> From: archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org [mailto:archivesspace_users_group-bounces at lyralists.lyrasis.org] On Behalf Of Brian Hoffman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:34 PM
> To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
> Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Archon creator records and repositories
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I’m not sure I fully understand the question, but I can say that Agents in ArchivesSpace are ‘global’ in scope, meaning that they (and other records like Subjects) are essentially shared among all the repositories. I don’t know if creators are associated with a particular repository in Archon, but I am guessing that if they are changing the repository they are associated with would not have any effect on the results, given the current migration tool.
>
> If I’m misunderstanding the issue please let me know.
>
> Brian
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 5:15 PM, Matthew J Gorzalski <mGorzalski at lib.siu.edu <mailto:mGorzalski at lib.siu.edu>> wrote:
>
> Can an ASpace developer tell me what role repository designation plays for a Creator record in Archon during migration? I’m thinking about changing the repository designation to (Select One) for all of our Creator records and seeing if that improves the results we see in ASpace post-migration.
>
> Thank you,
>
> MATT GORZALSKI
> University Archivist
>
> MORRIS LIBRARY
> MAIL CODE 6632
> SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
> 605 AGRICULTURE DR
> CARBONDALE, IL 62901
>
> mgorzalski at lib.siu.edu <mailto:mgorzalski at lib.siu.edu>
> P: 618/453-2225
> F: 618/453-3440
> lib.siu.edu <http://lib.siu.edu/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
> Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org <mailto:Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
> Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org <mailto:Archivesspace_Users_Group at lyralists.lyrasis.org>
> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/pipermail/archivesspace_users_group/attachments/20150830/ad3437a3/attachment.html>
More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group
mailing list