[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Inconsistent Accession Identifer display
michael.rush at yale.edu
Fri Mar 28 15:30:55 EDT 2014
I've noticed that way in which multi-part accession identifiers is displayed is inconsistent.
First, the segments of the accession number display as part of the accession title, both in the title column in any list of accessions and across the top of the accession record. I personally don't think the identifier should be included in the accession title in this way, but it's confusing because the identifier segments are separated by commas in that context. In the Identifier column of a list of accessions, the segments are separated by dashes.
I think it would be helpful to display accession identifiers more consistently. My personal preference would be to remove them from displays of accession titles altogether, but if the community consensus is to keep them there, they should be consistent with display elsewhere and dash-separated.
Has anyone else noticed this? Thoughts?
Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library
The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library will close for a major renovation in May 2015, reopening in August 2016. We will maintain a reading room in Sterling Memorial Library during this time, but access to various collections will be limited as early as April 2014 while we prepare for closure. For details, please visit our renovation website at http://beineckelibraryrenovation.yale.edu/.
More information about the Archivesspace_Users_Group